Re: qcam on NetBSD
Thomas Davis writes:
> > Real OS???
> > bahahahahahahahahahahahaha
> No OS wars here folks. If you want to argue about OS's, please take it
> somewhere else, or I'm out of here.
> If it's Unix based (or look and feel), we want to support it. Connectix
> doesn't want to, so somebody has to do it.
Hell, I don't care if this becomes a connectix development list. The
more people we have working on it, the better. Now hmmm... can
anybody think of a portable way to unroll the loops in qc_scan? I
don't think an unrolled C implementation is going to be fast enough
because of the need to keep the I/O port in the DX register where IN
and OUT need it. I think it'll be portable "enough" if we use ``as''
assembler source, because the DOS and OS/2 people can compile it using
their respective gcc ports.
-russ <firstname.lastname@example.org> http://www.crynwr.com/~nelson
Crynwr Software | Crynwr Software sells packet driver support | PGP ok
11 Grant St. | +1 315 268 1925 voice | Good government is a contradiction
Potsdam, NY 13676 | +1 315 268 9201 FAX | in terms. Ask me for details.