Re: qcam on NetBSD

To: unwin@spunky.roadkill.com (Roger A. Unwin)
Subject: Re: qcam on NetBSD
From: Thomas Davis <Thomas.Davis@mnscorp.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Jan 1996 08:16:08 -0600 (CST)
Cc: linux-connectix@crynwr.com
From mnscorp.com!tdavis Fri Jan 12 09: 28:08 1996
In-Reply-To: <199601120721.BAA07664@spunky.roadkill.com> from "Roger A. Unwin" at Jan 12, 96 01:21:29 am

> 
> Real OS??? 
> bahahahahahahahahahahahaha


He was talking Unix type OS's vs. MS Windows 3.1/Win95, no NetBSD vs.
Linux vs FreeBSD.

No OS wars here folks.  If you want to argue about OS's, please take it
somewhere else, or I'm out of here.

If it's Unix based (or look and feel), we want to support it.  Connectix
doesn't want to, so somebody has to do it.

-- 
Thomas Davis			| Internet:	Thomas.Davis@mnscorp.com
Systems Consultant		| Snail Mail:	Suite 528
Midwest Network Solutions Corp.	| 		1941 South 42nd Street
(402) 346-7687			|		Omaha, NE 68105-2939

Follow-Ups:

Re: qcam on NetBSD

From: nelson@crynwr.com (Russell Nelson)

References:

qcam on NetBSD

From: "Roger A. Unwin" <unwin@spunky.roadkill.com>

Prev: No Subject
Next: Re: qcam on NetBSD
Index: Mail Index
Thread: Mail Thread Index