Re: QCAM 0.3 now available.

To: linux-connectix@crynwr.com
Subject: Re: QCAM 0.3 now available.
From: Paul Haas <paulh@hamjudo.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Jan 1996 02:46:04 -0500 (EST)
From hamjudo.com!paulh Tue Jan 9 04: 02:19 1996
In-Reply-To: <m0tZXrM-000G3BC@ns.crynwr.com>

On Tue, 9 Jan 1996, Russell Nelson wrote:

> And the probe program just takes the resultant value and writes it
> into qcam.conf.  Seems like that gives the desired behavior in all
> cases.

Except when there are 2 or more cameras.  I realize it is a small nit. 
I will probably have more than one Quickcam in the not too distant 
future.  It'll be easy to customize the code, but I'd rather not have to.

Or did I miss something, and we can have multiple Quickcam listed in 
qcam.conf?
--
Paul Haas
paulh@hamjudo.com, (I'm not putting images on the web until I get the 
junk out of the background.  But I have been trying the code as it gets 
posted, and I am really impressed with the work you folks have done.)

Follow-Ups:

Re: QCAM 0.3 now available.

From: nelson@crynwr.com (Russell Nelson)

Re: QCAM 0.3 now available.

From: scott@laird.com (Scott Laird)

References:

Re: QCAM 0.3 now available.

From: nelson@crynwr.com (Russell Nelson)