Re: picture quality xqcam vs. xcqcam

• To: Gero Wedemann <Gero.Wedemann@dkfz-heidelberg.de>
• Subject: Re: picture quality xqcam vs. xcqcam
• From: Patrick <patrick@cs.virginia.edu>
• Date: Mon, 19 May 1997 09:47:49 -0400 (EDT)
• cc: quickcam-list <quickcam-drivers@crynwr.com>
• Delivered-To: quickcam-drivers@crynwr.com
• In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.3.95.970519142448.25996B-100000@hadrian.inet.dkfz-heidelberg.de>

> I was playing around with the two drivers for the QuichCam color and I am
> wondering why the quality of the picture of the qcam driver seem to be
> better than of the cqcam driver.

You are probably using cqcam in 32bpp mode.  It's faster (2 to 3 times
faster), and it allows larger pictures (up to 640x480), but the images are
noticeably fuzzier.  Use the -32- option or change the default bpp to 24 in
config.h. 

There's an explanation (albeit, probably a brief one) of this and other 
factors in my man page.

--Patrick

• Re: picture quality xqcam vs. xcqcam
• From: Gero Wedemann <Gero.Wedemann@DKFZ-Heidelberg.DE>

• picture quality xqcam vs. xcqcam
• From: Gero Wedemann <Gero.Wedemann@DKFZ-Heidelberg.DE>

• Prev: Re: picture quality xqcam vs. xcqcam
• Next: Re: picture quality xqcam vs. xcqcam
• Index: Mail Index
• Thread: Mail Thread Index