Re: assembly language and unrolling loops

• To: linux-connectix@crynwr.com
• Subject: Re: assembly language and unrolling loops
• From: nelson@crynwr.com (Russell Nelson)
• Date: Fri, 12 Jan 96 14:10 EST
• From crynwr.com!nelson Fri Jan 12 14: 23:14 1996
• In-Reply-To: <30F6ADF2.673E@1000klub.com>
• References: <199601121620.KAA09249@lanshark.mnscorp.com> <30F6ADF2.673E@1000klub.com>

Paul Chinn writes:
 > Thomas Davis wrote:

 > I get these numbers inside a horribly mutilated version of xfqcam that 
 > is totally coded ineffeciently, outputs its image to an xwindow, and 
 > yields time to XForms to process a control panel.  So if I can get this 
 > performance under these circumstances, I suspect that unrolling loops 
 > and writing assembly language stuff isn't going to buy us anything.

Unless :) you don't happen to *have* a Pentium(tm) 133 and a
bidirectional parallel port.

-russ <nelson@crynwr.com>    http://www.crynwr.com/~nelson
Crynwr Software   | Crynwr Software sells packet driver support | PGP ok
11 Grant St.      | +1 315 268 1925 voice | Good government is a contradiction
Potsdam, NY 13676 | +1 315 268 9201 FAX   | in terms.  Ask me for details.

• Re: assembly language and unrolling loops
• From: Thomas Davis <Thomas.Davis@mnscorp.com>

• Re: qcam on NetBSD
• From: Thomas Davis <Thomas.Davis@mnscorp.com>
• Re: assembly language and unrolling loops
• From: Paul Chinn <loomer@1000klub.com>

• Prev: Re: qcam on DOS
• Next: Re: qcam on NetBSD
• Index: Mail Index
• Thread: Mail Thread Index