Re: Is Quickcam still a good deal?

• To: quickcam-drivers@crynwr.com
• Subject: Re: Is Quickcam still a good deal?
• From: Russell Nelson <nelson@crynwr.com>
• Date: 14 Jul 1997 14:28:39 -0000
• Delivered-To: quickcam-drivers@crynwr.com
• In-Reply-To: <9707141023.ZM358@woodstock.global.proximity.on.ca>
• References: <199707131747.NAA18607@maya.sos.on.ca> <Pine.LNX.3.91.970713200256.2417B-100000@moe.aysnet.com> <19970714135445.26175.qmail@desk.crynwr.com> <nelson@crynwr.com> <9707141023.ZM358@woodstock.global.proximity.on.ca>

Chris Tyler writes:
 > Shouldn't that be...
 > 
 > 	analog -> analog -> analog -> digital
 > 	light     CCD       NTSC      video capture
 > 
 > The charge on each CCD cell after exposure is an analog value,

Yes, in intensity there is only one a/d conversion.  But in X-Y space,
each cell digitizes its entire space.  You can definitely see
beating of the one period against the digitization period for certain
values of each.

-- 
-russ <nelson@crynwr.com>    http://www.crynwr.com/~nelson
Crynwr Software sells network driver support    | PGPok | good luck, have fun!
521 Pleasant Valley Rd. | +1 315 268 1925 voice | taxes feed the naked
Potsdam, NY 13676-3213  | +1 315 268 9201 FAX   | and clothe the hungry.

• Re: Is Quickcam still a good deal?
• From: Gary Lawrence Murphy <garym@maya.sos.on.ca>
• Re: Is Quickcam still a good deal?
• From: Stew Benedict <benedict@netcom.com>
• Re: Is Quickcam still a good deal?
• From: Russell Nelson <nelson@crynwr.com>
• Re: Is Quickcam still a good deal?
• From: "Chris Tyler" <chris@woodstock.global.proximity.on.ca>

• Prev: Re: Is Quickcam still a good deal?
• Next: Re: Is Quickcam still a good deal?
• Index: Mail Index
• Thread: Mail Thread Index