Re: real-world experience with QuickCam in the kernel

• To: Sujal Patel <smpatel@wam.umd.edu>
• Subject: Re: real-world experience with QuickCam in the kernel
• From: "Matthew N. Dodd" <winter@jurai.net>
• Date: Sat, 3 Feb 1996 04:41:13 -0600 (CST)
• cc: Paul Traina <pst@shockwave.com>, Thomas Davis <Thomas.Davis@mnscorp.com>, multimedia@freebsd.org, linux-connectix@crynwr.com
• From jurai.net!winter Sat Feb 3 06: 28:58 1996
• In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.91.960203050941.256A-100000@xi.dorm.umd.edu>

On Sat, 3 Feb 1996, Sujal Patel wrote:
> > a frame.  This is unnoticeable while doing single frame captures,  but
> > completely sucks when doing movies.
> Yeah, this really bites.  If only they wired up the ACK line, and sent an 
> interrupt when it was ready to send some data.

Hell, get a few of the people on hackers to look at this, maybe they
would add a framebuffer for the QC to their "FreeBSD gadget". :)
Conceptually, it would look to be a straightforward hardware device.


Have fun.

| Matthew N. Dodd   | winter@jurai.net    | http://www.jurai.net/~winter    |
| Technical Manager | mdodd@intersurf.net | http://www.intersurf.net        |
| InterSurf Online  | "Welcome to the net Sir, would you like a handbasket?"|

• Re: real-world experience with QuickCam in the kernel
• From: Sujal Patel <smpatel@wam.umd.edu>

• Prev: Re: real-world experience with QuickCam in the kernel
• Next: Re: real-world experience with QuickCam in the kernel
• Index: Mail Index
• Thread: Mail Thread Index