Re: Is Quickcam still a good deal?

I've a complaint with the Quickcam, and it doesn't appear that
the Eggcam is much better.

With a horizontal resolution of 320 pixels, the 45 to 55 degree
viewing angle means the resolution is _much_ less than the
unaided human eye.  This means that images of distant objects
don't "look" sharp.

I'd really like the option of a different lens assembly to
bring the viewing angle down to under 10 degrees.

Has anyone located (perhaps from Edmund Scientific) different

Randolph Bentson