Re: A first (disappointing) answer from Connectix

• To: Hanno Mueller <hmueller@mail.kabel.de>
• Subject: Re: A first (disappointing) answer from Connectix
• From: "Chris Tyler" <chris@woodstock.global.proximity.on.ca.proximity.on.ca>
• Date: Mon, 14 Jul 1997 10:10:56 -0400
• Cc: quickcam-drivers@crynwr.com
• Delivered-To: quickcam-drivers@crynwr.com
• In-Reply-To: Hanno Mueller <hmueller@mail.kabel.de> "A first (disappointing) answer from Connectix" (Jul 14, 3:05pm)
• References: <33CA2426.2A11EEDA@kabel.de>
• Reply-to: Chris Tyler <Chris@Global.Proximity.ON.CA>
• Sender: Chris Tyler <Chris@Global.Proximity.ON.CA>

On Jul 14,  3:05pm, Hanno Mueller wrote:
> Subject: A first (disappointing) answer from Connectix
> Today I have received a first answer from Connectix about my VIDEC mail.
> It is from the PR department and obviously, they did not even READ the
> message that I had sent them.

I think a carefully-worded snail-mail or a fax to the CEO might be better than
e-mail to support. Let's get someone who can make real decisions.

-- 
Chris Tyler                       <Chris@Global.Proximity.ON.CA>
Global Proximity Corporation      http://Global.Proximity.ON.CA/
Internet and Computer Consulting  (519) 421-3541 / fax (519) 421-2107
*** Organizers of the Woodstock Business Internet Conference ***

• Re: A first (disappointing) answer from Connectix
• From: Hanno Mueller <hmueller@mail.kabel.de>

• A first (disappointing) answer from Connectix
• From: Hanno Mueller <hmueller@mail.kabel.de>

• Prev: Re: Is Quickcam still a good deal?
• Next: Re: Is Quickcam still a good deal?
• Index: Mail Index
• Thread: Mail Thread Index