qcam 0.91 and second qcam..

• To: quickcam-drivers@crynwr.com
• Subject: qcam 0.91 and second qcam..
• From: pfriedel@execpc.com
• Date: Mon, 2 Jun 1997 12:50:48 -0500 (CDT)
• Delivered-To: quickcam-drivers@crynwr.com

Any ideas why my (new) (non-KB-fuse blowing) (so far) has this
_really_ nasty tendency to wildly fluctuate in image quality when I
run xqcam like this?

xqcam -D -x100 -y150 -t50 -l126 -E2 -b150 -w80 -c10 -r

  By "wildly fluctuate", I mean that successive images are brighter
and darker, in a fairly random manner.  If I turn on -W, the image
evens out, and it doesn't look like the lights above me are flickering
horribly.

  Of course, -W is _really_ slow.  (.25 or so FPS, if I'm lucky.)

  Am I running into a bum batch of Refurb cameras, or is this pretty
normal?

  Note: This didn't happen with the last camera, but it also had fewer
bum pixels in the make.darkmask program.  Unfortunately, it had this
nasty tendency to eat my botherboards alive.

  (Shiver) If this one doesn't work out, I may have to..  Gasp.  Pay
$79 for one from CompUSA.  I love this little beastie.

-- 
Patrick Friedel             For Domain questions or support please 
Domain Manager and Support  call us at 789-4200x305, or send mail 
                            to domain@execpc.com. 

• Re: qcam 0.91 and second qcam..
• From: "David L. Sifry" <david@sifry.com>

• Prev: Web Proxy Bug Fixed
• Next: Re: qcam 0.91 and second qcam..
• Index: Mail Index
• Thread: Mail Thread Index