Subject: Re: Creative Common as open source license?
From: Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@staszic.waw.pl>
Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2005 18:44:49 +0100

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Friday 14 of January 2005 01:45, Manuel Bastioni wrote:
> The 'source' of 3D model is a list of verts and faces, or the 3d file
> itself. This make some strange GPL loops (the output is a new 3D mesh,
> derived work from GPL'd 3D mesh, and so again under GPL)...and the
> problem is the professional user don't want release the models (source)
> of their works.

You can also add a note taht you allow the output of the plugin to be 
licensed under different license.

- -- 
Best regards ,                                        _     _
 .o. | Liege of Serenly Enlightened Majesty of      o' \,=./ `o
 ..o | Computer Science,  Michal "mina86" Nazarewicz   (o o)
 ooo +--<mina86*tlen.pl>--<jid:mina86*jabber.org>--ooO--(_)--Ooo--
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFB6AUVUyzLALfG3x4RApaIAKCwuriilC9710SetLWffr3gonfHnQCeKaM0
UrQDnbPuk3PLTmMMm5uFCfk=
=8mCe
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----