Subject: Re: compatibility and the OSD
From: Bob Scheifler <Bob.Scheifler@Sun.COM>
Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2004 17:33:05 -0400

> I can't help noticing that you're ignorning my point,

Sorry, that's not my intent, I'm simply misunderstanding it.

> My point -- once
> again -- was that requiring attribution does not constitute any
> meaningful "restriction on distribution" per any reasonable
> understanding of that phrase.

Do you mean that the notion of requiring attribution, absent knowing
the actual form of attribution that is mandated, does not in and of
itself constitute a meaningful restriction, or do you mean that there
is no possible form of mandated attribution that would ever constitute
a meaningful restriction?

- Bob