Subject: Re: compatibility and the OSD
From: Russell Nelson <nelson@crynwr.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2004 10:03:43 -0400

Bob Scheifler writes:
 > Is the intent of OSD#3 to require that open *source* licenses be
 > open *source and binary* licenses?

Yes, or open *source and artwork*, should somebody choose to plaster
the source on a canvas.  Or open *source and music*, should somebody
choose to turn the source into sound.  The nature of the derivative
work is not specified.  Do not think that derivative works are only
limited to source code.

-- 
--My blog is at angry-economist.russnelson.com  | Violence never solves
Crynwr sells support for free software  | PGPok | problems, it just changes
521 Pleasant Valley Rd. | +1 212-202-2318 voice | them into more subtle
Potsdam, NY 13676-3213  | FWD# 404529 via VOIP  | problems.