Subject: Re: LAB Public License proposal
From: "Rod Dixon, J.D., LL.M." <rdixon@cyberspaces.org>
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 15:35:16 -0500

It might help if you highlighted the changes (using color text or bold
facing). Is your explanation as to why you have declined to adopt the CUA
Office Public License limited to the desire to "comply" with regulations in
three jurisdictions? Would you be more specific?

Rod

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "DJ Anubis" <anubis@lab-project.net>
To: <license-discuss@opensource.org>
Sent: Sunday, March 14, 2004 12:02 PM
Subject: LAB Public License proposal


: Hello,
:
: Intending to use the following license for LAB Project, I need your advice
and
: discussion about.
: It is an adapted version of
http://www.opensource.org/licenses/cuaoffice.php
: modified to comply with both USA, French and EEC regulations. Only some
minor
: formulations and definitions changes and a specific Frenc regulations
: paragrah were added to comply with 3 regulations.
:
: Pre publication is at : http://labsupport.free.fr/liclab.html temporary
: address before publishing on official project.site.
:
: As the text is rather long, I prefer to submit it as link instead of full
text
: inclusion.
:
: Thanks for your advice
:
: JCR
: aka DJ Anubis
: --
: license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3

--
license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3