Subject: Re: Nees help selecting a license
From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2003 11:06:54 -0400

Christophe Dupre scripsit:

> It seems to me that TrollTech is already doing something similar, but what
> isn't clear to me si how to deal with 3rd party patch submission. Clearly,
> we would not be the copyright owner of those patches, and so wouldn't have
> the right to sell commercial licenses for them, yet we'd like to not have
> to maintain two versions of the code.

Do what the FSF does: don't accept any patches without a written assignment
of copyright to you.  (It has to be in writing, or the magic doesn't work.)

-- 
A poetical purist named Cowan           [that's me: jcowan@reutershealth.com]
Once put the rest of us dowan.          [on xml-dev]
    "Your verse would be sweeter        http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
    If it only had metre                http://www.reutershealth.com
And rhymes that didn't force me to frowan."     [overpacked line!] --Michael Kay
--
license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3