On Jul 6, 2007, at 02:12, Rick Moen wrote:
> Quoting Jamey Hicks (firstname.lastname@example.org):
>> There are no OSI-approved licenses for open source hardware, so I am
>> proposing this license.
> My understanding is that OSI's licence approval process
> (http://www.opensource.org/docs/certification_mark.html) is
> for _software_ licences. That scope limitation came up previously
> people proposed documentation licences for certification; I suspect
> same logic applies here.
I'm afraid the distinction between "software" and "hardware" is
getting harder and harder to make. The Verilog that's used to make
the UltraSPARC T1 is definitely software, and the GPL (or any other
Free software license approved for open source community use by OSI)
seems 100% applicable to me.
If we allow special "hardware" licenses because the copyrighted work
is used for that purpose, we are on a slippery slope towards many
other specialist (an in my view redundant) sub-categories.