Subject: Re: Amdahl's law and non-proliferation
From: Thorsten Glaser <tg@66h.42h.de>
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2005 07:32:15 +0000

Forrest J. Cavalier III dixit:

> 4. I hold that the fraction of the 11% which is "easily influenced" is small
>   because....most authors have some good reasons for choosing outside the
>   "big 4".  "Good reasons" are not easily countered.

While I agree with this,

>    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amdahl%27s_law

linking to a webpage with a licence which even forbids me to
see the content (since lynx creates a non-world-readable
copy of the file, which is forbidden due to the "no DRM" clause
of the GNU FDL) is not considered polite.

Please read http://home.twcny.rr.com/nerode/neroden/fdl.html
and refrain from further linking to this unfree project "Wikipedia".

bye,
//mirabile