Subject: Re: Amdahl's law and non-proliferation
From: Thorsten Glaser <>
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2005 07:32:15 +0000

Forrest J. Cavalier III dixit:

> 4. I hold that the fraction of the 11% which is "easily influenced" is small
>   because....most authors have some good reasons for choosing outside the
>   "big 4".  "Good reasons" are not easily countered.

While I agree with this,


linking to a webpage with a licence which even forbids me to
see the content (since lynx creates a non-world-readable
copy of the file, which is forbidden due to the "no DRM" clause
of the GNU FDL) is not considered polite.

Please read
and refrain from further linking to this unfree project "Wikipedia".