Subject: Re: OSL 2.0 and linking of libraries
From: Ken Arromdee <arromdee@rahul.net>
Date: Fri, 2 Apr 2004 08:31:42 -0800 (PST)

On Fri, 2 Apr 2004, Peter Prohaska wrote:
> On 1) This way, it doesn't matter what derived work is anymore because
> we just define it. That should reduce the FAQ size.

But isn't "derived work" a legal term?  Open source licenses can put limits
on derived works since if you reject the license you have no rights to make
derived works at all.  If you define "derived work" to be something broader
than what the law says, this is no longer true and the license doesn't function
as intended.

--
license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3