Subject: Re: For Approval: Educational Community License 1.0
From: Matthew Flaschen <>
Date: Mon, 07 May 2007 14:37:15 -0400

Christopher D.Coppola wrote:
> Without approval we'd necessarily need to stay
> with ECL 1.0 which negates the benefits of our diligent contribution
> agreement practices and does nothing for patent grants.

As I mentioned earlier, the word "use" in ECL 1.0 arguably constitutes a
broad patent grant.  So from this perspective ECL 2.0 does grant less.

Matt Flaschen