Messages 66xx


00: Re: Compatibility of the AFL with the GPL (Mark Rafn)
01: Re: Compatibility of the AFL with the GPL (Rod Dixon, J.D., LL.M.)
02: Open Source Business Found Parasitic, and the ADCL (maa.liacc.up.pt)
03: Re: Compatibility of the AFL with the GPL (John Cowan)
04: Re: Open Source Business Found Parasitic, and the ADCL (John Cowan)
05: Re: Open Source Business Found Parasitic, and the ADCL (Chris Gray)
06: Re: Compatibility of the AFL with the GPL (John Cowan)
07: Re: Compatibility of the AFL with the GPL (Rod Dixon)
08: Re: Compatibility of the AFL with the GPL (John Cowan)
09: Re: Compatibility of the AFL with the GPL (John Cowan)
10: Re: Open Source Business Found Parasitic, and the ADCL (maa.liacc.up.pt)
11: Re: Open Source Business Found Parasitic, and the ADCL (Robert C. Leif)
12: Re: Open Source Business Found Parasitic, and the ADCL (John Cowan)
13: Re: Open Source Business Found Parasitic, and the ADCL (maa.liacc.up.pt)
14: Re: Must publish vs. must supply (Chris F Clark)
15: Re: Open Source Business Found Parasitic, and the ADCL (John Cowan)
16: Re: Open Source Business Found Parasitic, and the ADCL (maa.liacc.up.pt)
17: Re: Open Source Business Found Parasitic, and the ADCL (John Cowan)
18: Re: Open Source Business Found Parasitic, and the ADCL (John Cowan)
19: Re: Compatibility of the AFL with the GPL (Rod Dixon)
20: Re: Must publish vs. must supply (Abe Kornelis)
21: Re: Compatibility of the AFL with the GPL (Brian Behlendorf)
22: Re: Open Source Business Found Parasitic, and the ADCL (Rick Moen)
23: Optimal license for Java projects ... (Gunther Schadow)
24: Re: Must publish vs. must supply (Abe Kornelis)
25: MPL (and APL) license issues (Fabio Alemagna)
26: Re: Open Source Business Found Parasitic, and the ADCL (David Johnson)
27: Re: Open Source Business Found Parasitic, and the ADCL (David Johnson)
28: Re: Optimal license for Java projects ... (David Johnson)
29: Re: Compatibility of the AFL with the GPL (Richard Stallman)
30: Re: Compatibility of the AFL with the GPL (Richard Stallman)
31: Re: Optimal license for Java projects ... (Mitchell Baker)
32: Re: Open Source Business Found Parasitic, and the ADCL (Rick Moen)
33: Re: Open Source Business Found Parasitic, and the ADCL (maa.liacc.up.pt)
34: Re: Optimal license for Java projects ... (John Cowan)
35: Re: Open Source Business Found Parasitic, and the ADCL (Chris Gray)
36: Re: Optimal license for Java projects ... (Chris Gray)
37: Re: Open Source Business Found Parasitic, and the ADCL (Chris F Clark)
38: What about LGPL? Re: Compatibility of the AFL with the GPL (Andrew C. Oliver)
39: Re: What about LGPL? Re: Compatibility of the AFL with the GPL (Rod Dixon)
40: Re: Open Source Business Found Parasitic, and the ADCL (Rick Moen)
41: Re: Open Source Business Found Parasitic, and the ADCL (James Harrell)
42: Please add "Public Domain" to "license" list (David A. Wheeler)
43: Re: Optimal license for Java projects ... (Mark Wielaard)
44: Re: Please add "Public Domain" to "license" list (Rick Moen)
45: Re: Please add "Public Domain" to "license" list (Bob Doyle)
46: Re: Open Source Business Found Parasitic, and the ADCL (Rick Moen)
47: Re: Open Source Business Found Parasitic, and the ADCL (David K. Gasaway)
48: Re: Open Source Business Found Parasitic, and the ADCL (maa.liacc.up.pt)
49: Re: Please add "Public Domain" to "license" list (David A. Wheeler)
50: Re: Open Source Business Found Parasitic, and the ADCL (maa.liacc.up.pt)
51: Re: What about LGPL? Re: Compatibility of the AFL with the GPL (Andrew C. Oliver)
52: Re: Open Source Business Found Parasitic, and the ADCL (maa.liacc.up.pt)
53: Re: Please add "Public Domain" to "license" list - FSF accepts this. (David A. Wheeler)
54: Re: Open Source Business Found Parasitic, and the ADCL (maa.liacc.up.pt)
55: Re: Open Source Business Found Parasitic, and the ADCL (Rick Moen)
56: Re: Open Source Business Found Parasitic, and the ADCL (Ralph Mellor)
57: Re: Please add "Public Domain" to "license" list (David A. Wheeler)
58: Re: Please add "Public Domain" to "license" list (Rick Moen)
59: Re: Open Source Business Found Parasitic, and the ADCL (Rick Moen)
60: Re: Open Source Business Found Parasitic, and the ADCL (Brian Behlendorf)
61: Re: Open Source Business Found Parasitic, and the ADCL (Robin 'Roblimo' Miller)
62: Re: Open Source Business Found Parasitic, and the ADCL (Rick Moen)
63: Re: What about LGPL? Re: Compatibility of the AFL with the GPL (Brian Behlendorf)
64: Re: Please add "Public Domain" to "license" list (Rod Dixon)
65: Re: Open Source Business Found Parasitic, and the ADCL (James Harrell)
66: Compatibility of the ASL and LGPL in the specific case of Java WAS: (Re: What about LGPL? Re: Compatibility of the AFL with the GPL) (Andrew C. Oliver)
67: Re: Please add "Public Domain" to "license" list (Mark Rafn)
68: Re: Compatibility of the AFL with the GPL (Russell Nelson)
69: Re: Optimal license for Java projects ... (Gunther Schadow)
70: Re: Please add "Public Domain" to "license" list (Rod Dixon)
71: Re: Please add "Public Domain" to "license" list (John Cowan)
72: Re: Please add "Public Domain" to "license" list (Nick Moffitt)
73: Re: Open Source Business Found Parasitic, and the ADCL (John Cowan)
74: Re: Open Source Business Found Parasitic, and the ADCL (Mark Murphy)
75: Re: Open Source Business Found Parasitic, and the ADCL (Brian Behlendorf)
76: Re: Optimal license for Java projects ... (John Cowan)
77: Re: Open Source Business Found Parasitic, and the ADCL (Rick Moen)
78: Re: Please add "Public Domain" to "license" list (Rick Moen)
79: Re: Compatibility of the AFL with the GPL (Eben Moglen)
80: Re: Compatibility of the ASL and LGPL in the specific case of Java WAS: (Re: What about LGPL? Re: Compatibility of the AFL with the GPL) (Brian Behlendorf)
81: Re: Open Source Business Found Parasitic, and the ADCL (Ralph Mellor)
82: Re: Compatibility of the AFL with the GPL (Russell Nelson)
83: Re: Please add "Public Domain" to "license" list (Lawrence E. Rosen)
84: why MPL is hard for other companies to adopt? (was RE: Open Source Business Found Parasitic, and the ADCL) (James Harrell)
85: Re: Please add "Public Domain" to "license" list (Lawrence E. Rosen)
86: Re: Compatibility of the AFL with the GPL (Greg Pomerantz)
87: Re: Optimal license for Java projects ... (Andy Tai)
88: Re: Compatibility of the ASL and LGPL in the specific case of Java WAS: (Re: What about LGPL? Re: Compatibility of the AFL with the GPL) (Andrew C. Oliver)
89: Re: Please add "Public Domain" to "license" list (Lawrence E. Rosen)
90: Re: Open Source Business Found Parasitic, and the ADCL (John Cowan)
91: Re: why MPL is hard for other companies to adopt? (was RE: Open Source Business Found Parasitic, and the ADCL) (John Cowan)
92: Re: Optimal license for Java projects ... (David Johnson)
93: Re: Please add "Public Domain" to "license" list (David Johnson)
94: Re: Open Source Business Found Parasitic, and the ADCL (David Johnson)
95: Re: Compatibility of the AFL with the GPL (Russell Nelson)
96: Re: Compatibility of the AFL with the GPL (Lawrence E. Rosen)
97: Re: Optimal license for Java projects ... (John Cowan)
98: Re: Compatibility of the AFL with the GPL (Russell Nelson)
99: Re: Optimal license for Java projects ... (Ian Lance Taylor)