Subject: Legacy approval request - The PostgreSQL Licence
From: Dave Page <dpage@postgresql.org>
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 10:45:50 +0000
Thu, 26 Nov 2009 10:45:50 +0000
On September 24, I submitted what the PostgreSQL project believed to
be a variant of the BSD licence for approval. At the November 11 board
meeting, the request was rejected on the grounds that the licence was
not generic.

In light of that, and the fact that the discussion on this list
concluded that the licence was not actually a BSD derivative, despite
it's Berkeley origins, I'd like to resubmit the attached revised text
as 'The PostgreSQL Licence', having replaced references to PostgreSQL
and the University of California with generic placeholders.

I hope this meets the boards expectations, and look forward to seeing
the licence approved.

Regards, Dave.

-- 
Dave Page
PostgreSQL Core Team


<PRODUCT>

Copyright (c) <YEAR>, <ORGANISATION>

Permission to use, copy, modify, and distribute this software and its
documentation for any purpose, without fee, and without a written
agreement is hereby granted, provided that the above copyright notice
and this paragraph and the following two paragraphs appear in all
copies.

IN NO EVENT SHALL <ORGANISATION> BE LIABLE TO ANY PARTY FOR DIRECT,
INDIRECT, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES, INCLUDING
LOST PROFITS, ARISING OUT OF THE USE OF THIS SOFTWARE AND ITS
DOCUMENTATION, EVEN IF <ORGANISATION> HAS BEEN ADVISED OF THE
POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.

<ORGANISATION> SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS ANY WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT
NOT LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS
FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. THE SOFTWARE PROVIDED HEREUNDER IS ON AN "AS
IS" BASIS, AND <ORGANISATION> HAS NO OBLIGATIONS TO PROVIDE
MAINTENANCE, SUPPORT, UPDATES, ENHANCEMENTS, OR MODIFICATIONS.